Vdot manual of structure and bridge division
Yet there is a need to update the guidelines based on contemporary experience and the knowledge gained through technological advances.
This report presents and discusses the preliminary findings of Phase I of a multi-phase study to determine the performance of bridge deck overlays in Virginia. The overlay types identified to be the most commonly used by the nine VDOT districts were latex-modified concrete, epoxy concrete, silica fume concrete, very-early-strength latex-modified concrete, and hot-mix asphalt concrete with a water-resistant membrane. From interviews, wide ranges in service life, even for the same overlay type, were found in every VDOT district.
Their contact information can be found at the following link: Points of Contact. Todd Springer, P. Springer VDOT. SGR Bridge Program. Significant scope items include, but are not limited to, the items below. Conceptual drawings or sketches below are required:. Project cost estimates shall be submitted per the requirements below. Only one estimate is required if the SGR repair scope is to replace the structure. FY to FY July 1, data coming soon. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth Transportation Board, or the Federal Highway Administration.
This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. We could post our responses to these questions on the Teams site. I encourage you to ask these questions throughout this or that forum so others that have similar questions can see the responses there as well. They are available for download in ProjectWise. Timeframe of the rollout and training has not been established at this time.
Yes, we have converted several projects for testing of the upgrade process. We do have several projects that are utilizing ORD.
Only one was converted, the rest were new projects. These projects are going ok so far. We have found issues with creating renditions in PW and are working with Bentley to get it resolved. We are currently maintaining a list of projects that Districts are requesting to convert. We have had some issues with the conversion process with features not matching which have been corrected and are being tested.
The only issues that remain outstanding is a problem that Bentley is currently looking into with files that have corridors clipped in them. This may be a software bug and we are hoping to get this resolved ASAP.
0コメント