Fbi ci program

Know Thyself. S4 E1 Sep 21, All That Glitters Part 1. Show More. Related Shows. What's New. Episode Guide. This elite unit brings to bear all their talents, intellect and technical expertise on major cases in order to keep New York and the country safe.

Born into a multigenerational law enforcement family, Special Agent Maggie Bell commits deeply to the people she works with as well as those she protects. Overseeing them is Special Agent in Charge, Isobel Castille, who operates under intense pressure and has undeniable command authority. The team also includes Assistant Special Agent in Charge Jubal Valentine, the nerve center of the office whose ability to easily relate to and engage with both superiors and subordinates makes him a master motivator.

These first-class agents tenaciously investigate cases of tremendous magnitude, including terrorism, organized crime and counterintelligence. Discover the other teams of The FBIs. Agent Maggie Bell Missy Peregrym. Jubal Valentine Jeremy Sisto. Stuart Scola John Boyd. Examples are contractors holding Top Secret security clearances and National Laboratories.

Explanation: Each field office conducts an all source threat assessment documenting foreign threat presence targeting US interests including visitors, students, foreign officials, and emigres. Measure reflects operational activities directed at assessment of the identified threat.

Explanation: Cost savings based upon number of students completing online course, as opposed to traveling to attend platform instruction. Protection of US national security is the FBI's top priority and counterintelligence is a critical component of the FBI's overall strategy, second only to counterterrorism.

CI Program's Strategic Plan, depicted via a five-tiered pyramid, is widely distributed internally, is taught in a variety of CI training courses, and is described on the FBI's public website. Explanation: The CI Program's strategic goals address four major threats to US national security: proliferation of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives information, technology and materials; foreign intelligence penetration of the US Intelligence Community; foreign intelligence penetration of other US government agenices and contractors; and foreign intelligence compromise of critical national assets.

Assessments consider the threat from specific countries and drive field office investigative activities in five issue areas. Is the program designed so that it is not redundant or duplicative of any other Federal, state, local or private effort?

Joint investigations with the Intelligence Community and other agencies leverage federal resources and avoid duplication. Part 1. Is the program design free of major flaws that would limit the program's effectiveness or efficiency?

Through a combination of national initiatives and local threat priorities, the CI Program is able to address the most serious CI threats posed to the US and its interests. Direct federal funding towards counterintelligence efforts is the most appropriate program structure, since the highly classified and inherently governmental nature of its activities requires federal employee Special Agents and analysts to be directly involved.

This type of funding structure also allows the FBI to most effectively and efficiently allocate its resources towards target areas. Evidence: The current structure and management of the CI Program allows the shifting of resources within the program at the field level in response to priority investigative and operational requirements. The semi-annual assessment of field office CI programs ensures the field program reflects national threat priorities and implements its goals and objectives.

Is the program design effectively targeted so that resources will address the program's purpose directly and will reach intended beneficiaries? At the highest level, CD creates a strategic plan to guide the overall direction of the program.

Tactical direction is provided through the establishment of program plans, which narrow program direction down to country threat levels. CD also prepares analytical tools in the form of threat matrices to guide attention to specific targets. Does the program have a limited number of specific long-term performance measures that focus on outcomes and meaningfully reflect the purpose of the program?

Explanation: The FBI's CI program has two long-term performance measures: 1 the percentage of field offices that have sufficiently identified foreign intelligence service activities; and 2 the percentage of field offices that have adequate coverage of known or suspected intelligence officers.

Field office adequacy in each area is determined by a comprehensive review. Outcome measures are not available for the CI program, since it is not possible to quantify foreign intelligence threats that FBI has not addressed and is not aware of.

Progress by the CI program is best measured by interventions that undermine the ability of foreign intelligence services to engage in activity counter to the interests of the US. Explanation: The CI program has set aggressive goals for long-term improvement in the percentage of field offices sufficiently addressing the foreign intelligence threat in their territories through CI's future planning materials include specific benchmarks to measure improved performance.

Does the program have a limited number of specific annual performance measures that can demonstrate progress toward achieving the program's long-term goals? Explanation: The FBI's CI program has three annual performance measures: the percentage of field offices that have adequately 1 engaged in strategic partnerships; 2 developed knowledge of vulnerabilities in their areas to foreign intelligence service intrusion; and3 identifyed priority threat country operations in their areas.

Explanation: Targets have been set forth in the three categories listed in 2. The CI program has established specific performance baselines and targets within each of the three categories. Explanation: Pursuant to the National Security Act of and subsequent legislation and Executive Orders , the FBI is the lead agency for counterintelligence, making the FBI's goals and performance evaluation distinct from all other agencies.

While other government partners contribute towards this mission, the FBI does not have public or private partners that share its mandate in this area. Are independent evaluations of sufficient scope and quality conducted on a regular basis or as needed to support program improvements and evaluate effectiveness and relevance to the problem, interest, or need? These Field Office Reviews are performed based upon five program strategy elements and an overall site rating.

Follow ups to Field Office Reviews are conducted by CI program managers within six to nine months following each review. Are Budget requests explicitly tied to accomplishment of the annual and long-term performance goals, and are the resource needs presented in a complete and transparent manner in the program's budget? Explanation: FBI budget requests do not clearly demonstrate links between budget enhancements and desired performance levels in outcome measures.

The nature of the CI program does not lend itself easily to this type of tracking, given the inherent difficulty in proving that results of CI program activity can be predictably attributed to any specific expenditure. Nonetheless, the CI program does document the resource needs that will increase its ability to conduct investigations and utilize specific interventions that ultimately prevent terrorist activity.

Explanation: The Counterintelligence Division strengthened its strategic planning by developing and implementing a National CI Strategy and requiring field offices to adhere to that strategy.

It also established a Strategic Planning Group to ensure implementation of the National CI Strategy and institute an ongoing evaluation process and field office mentoring program.

Does the agency regularly collect timely and credible performance information, including information from key program partners, and use it to manage the program and improve performance? Explanation: The CI Program uses a variety of quantitative and non- quantitative performance information to adjust program priorities as well as resources and to design new training programs.

The Field Office Reviews provide compehensive performance information, including input from other US government entities. As a result, field divisions are provided specific "roadmaps" to improve program performance. Are Federal managers and program partners including grantees, sub-grantees, contractors, cost-sharing partners, and other government partners held accountable for cost, schedule and performance results?

Are funds Federal and partners' obligated in a timely manner and spent for the intended purpose? Explanation: To track personnel expenditures, FBI's Finance Division FD uses a compensation and benefits model with current payroll information and projected number of new hires and separations to calculate the expected funding needed for compensation and benefit requirements for the remainder of the fiscal year.

The FBI monitors the discretionary spending of its divisions by utilizing a spending plan process developed by FD. Each quarter every FBIHQ Division is required to submit a packet that contains FBI Division's available funding and their detailed plans for spending any remaining funding they may have.